| ▲ | ngriffiths 27 minutes ago | |
In addition to covering the IPO in general last week, Matt Levine also wrote about this specific question Tuesday[1]: > Historically index providers were in the business of making these sorts of quality decisions, so that index funds were not forced to buy stocks they didn’t like. > These rules create some tension between the idea that an index is a list of all the stocks and the idea that an index is a list of all the good stocks. Historically, it didn’t matter all that much: The point of the stock market is to tell you which stocks are good, so a company with a high stock valuation should be a very good company, so it should get a high weighting in both the Index of Good Companies and the Index of All the Companies. > But SpaceX — and also maybe OpenAI and Anthropic in their coming IPOs — will probably break that link. SpaceX will probably (1) do all sorts of stuff that index funds hate and that index providers have specifically tried to exclude and also (2) be gigantic, because the market loves it. [1]: https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/newsletters/2026-05-26/ind... | ||