There is a market for an S&P 500 ETF without those companies. I'll immediately switch over

You probably want an ETF that follows something like the MSCI USA Ex Mega Cap index then: <https://www.msci.com/indexes/index/758086>

▲

fsckboy 8 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

you can buy S&P 500, and short the component companies you don't like, but caution, this will achieve the solvency you want, but you will likely remain irrational

▲

zzleeper 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Let me know if you find one! I'm at a loss. (And even then, if I switch I have to pay $$$ taxes on capital gains)

▲

stouset an hour ago | parent | next [-]

You can sidestep this entirely with a total-market fund like VTSAX/VTI, which hold the entire market and should be more resistant to being gamed.

They’re free-float adjusted so entities like SpaceX are valued only by what’s available on public markets. And Vanguard (and its funds) are owned by its investors, which makes it seem implausible that the rules would be rewritten in a way that would damage investors.

▲

SilverElfin an hour ago | parent [-]

VTI lists fast even before these recent changes as I recall. So it’s more vulnerable, not less.

▲

LPisGood an hour ago | parent | next [-]

It may list fast, but it covers many more securities from what I understand so it’s insulated. I think the fact is that any broad market ETF is gonna own at least some piece of a $1 trillion company.

▲

svachalek 18 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

The additional securities it includes are weighted by market cap though. So a total market fund ends up being 80% S&P 500, and even if they add thousands more companies those all fit in the 20% slot.

▲

felixgallo an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

well that's the problem, right? There is no justification for a trillion dollar Elon Musk valuation. And he and his investors know this. That's why they're trying to change the rules to dump the stock while it's irrational on every investor in the world. If they really believed in the value of the company, would they be bribing people to scam the index funds?

	▲	toomuchtodo 23 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Indeed, it's like robbing a bank while the bank is holding a party. Except its everyone's portfolios who are invested in the index funds with potential exposure in scope. High level, it's concerning to observe this unfold while almost every asset class is at its peak and there is no one willing to purchase (office real estate [1] [2], private equity [3], us equities [4], crypto, etc). Late Stage Capital Markets when you've exhausted greater fools available. [1] Office Real Estate Is Facing ‘a Year of Reckoning’ in 2025 - https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2024-12-18/commercia... \| https://archive.today/fTPSY - December 18, 2024 [2] Blackstone Is About to Take a 54% Loss on Iconic Seattle Tower - https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-29/blackston... \| https://archive.today/fcA8W - May 29, 2026 [3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47049024 (citations) [4] BlackRock Scales Back Equities After ‘Generational’ Earnings [Peak S&P] - https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-05-29/blackrock... \| https://archive.today/lMIcH - May 29th, 2026

▲

an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

[deleted]

▲

_delirium 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Any of the direct indexing providers will let you blacklist individual stocks from the index. The intended use is to exclude stocks you hold elsewhere (or receive as stock grants) to avoid causing wash sales, but it can also be easily used to make a custom "S&P 499".

▲

zzleeper an hour ago | parent [-]

I'm looking at Schwab (and saw a few others) and couldn't find anything: https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/primer-on-wash-sales

I would assume this is not an ETF but sth else?

	▲	zparky an hour ago \| parent [-]
		https://www.schwab.com/direct-indexing