| ▲ | servo_sausage 7 hours ago | |
If one pad is the bottleneck, and the goal is to ramp up to be a spacex competitor, then build more than one... Falcon has shown the playbook, and the demand for launch... The goal should be 2-4 launch sites in the medium term; with a second site very early to avoid exactly this. | ||
| ▲ | lunar_mycroft 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Until recently, SpaceX only acquired new pads because they needed a completely new launch site (SLC-4 in Vandenberg) or needed to launch a vehicle that their existing pad(s) didn't support (Falcon Heavy for LC-39A, Starship for Pad A in Boca Chica/Starbase). Currently, Blue Origin's only orbital launch vehicle is New Glenn, and their Vandenberg pad is still under construction. | ||
| ▲ | pbrum 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
I was going to say this too. And since we're at it: does anyone know how many launch pads the Chinese private space companies have, combined? | ||