It's an understandable but wrong attitude. If you don't have high profile failures like this, you aren't taking enough R&D risk. It's a fiercely ambitious industry and these launch attempts amount to what literally are moon shots. The race is on between various companies and countries as to who gets there first.

Boeing is pretty much out of the race at this point. Just too busy navel gazing and lobbying. There's a big risk that the next person on the moon might be from China. Blue Origin and SpaceX are the best things to happen to the rocket industry in decades. So, yes Blue Origin had a RUD with New Glenn. They should, learn and adapt and launch the next one. It would be good for SpaceX to have credible competition. And New Glenn seems like it could become that.

But if they only get their lessons every few years, they'll be competing against a fully reusable Starship rather than Falcon 9 & Falcon heavy by the time this thing becomes a serious launch vehicle. The goal posts are moving.

▲

hgoel 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

High profile failures that take out launch infrastructure are undesirable because the cost to that is much much higher than just losing the rocket. It means having all of your R&D and production pipelines stalled for at least months, usually years, while the rest of that fiercely ambitious industry races ahead.

This was routine pre-launch testing, not a launch attempt.

▲

Hugsbox 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Forgive my ignorance, but why would China being the next on the moon be such a bad thing? Aren't moon missions mostly just "look what I can do!" sorts of things?

▲

hgoel 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

For decades, Americans have been propagandized into the position that they alone are exceptional. Thus, anyone that challenges that belief becomes the enemy. It's gotten so bad, that "China might get there first" is the only way to get American politicians to actually stick to a target for more than 4 years.

▲

jillesvangurp 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Depends on your point of view. But I imagine some people in the US would not be happy to lose that race. The reason it was a race in the sixties is because they definitely didn't want the Russians to get there first.

▲

Hugsbox 3 hours ago | parent [-]

So purely so that China doesn't get the bragging rights? I guess I don't see the big deal but I'm sure it's more important than it seems on the surface.

	▲	brookst 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Some of that, and also because it’s a benchmark of program maturity. Think of it as not wanting China to be able to do things the US can’t, with some overtones of military capability, American exceptionalism, the symbolism of China not even being in the race that the US won 56 years ago, etc.

▲

pphysch 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

China isn't looking at it just for bragging rights, but as a step towards the first moon base. Some see it as a race for the frontier and territorial claims.

▲

harimau777 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That's easy to say if you aren't the one getting space junk dumped on you when a rocket explodes.

▲

Rover222 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Nah, failures that destroy the launch pad are just bad, any way you try to slice it.

▲

rhubarbtree 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Is there any reason to doubt that the Chinese will get (back) there first?

	▲	chihuahua 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Not first. Seventh. The successful manned moon landings so far: 1. United States of America 2. United States of America 3. United States of America 4. United States of America 5. United States of America 6. United States of America Now we're watching a riveting race for 7th place.
	▲	brookst 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Sure. It’s not easy to do. I think odds favor China right now, but it’s far from a done deal. Anything from geopolitics to internal politics to technical hurdles could interfere (ditto with the US and everyone else of course).

▲

watwut 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Boeing issue was that they in fact took the risks so that they move faster and cheaper.

> There's a big risk that the next person on the moon might be from China.

China seems to be focused more on pragmatic things and less on super expensive vanity projects.

▲

jillesvangurp 4 hours ago | parent [-]

They have a pretty concrete moon program. That would be one of the things they are focusing on.

	▲	phkahler 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I don't see China as being in a race though. They seem willing to play a long game in a lot of areas.

▲

mongol 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

What were the high profile failures in the Apollo program that proves your point?

	▲	qsi 5 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Apollo 1. Three astronauts died. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_1
	▲	m4rtink 7 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Not to mention there being a lot of launch failures pre and during the Apollo era, including pad explosions (there are nice compilations on youtube). But that was not really that much of an issue, as this was expected and there were dozens of pads built for these launches, so the testing cadence was not affected. There was no fatal launch failure for Apollo & pad explosion would be a problem with just 2 pads available. There were a couple Saturn V stage explosions during testing but again - those damaged test stands, not the pad.