|
| ▲ | haunter 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| 1996 The village is pretty much gone https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZTFgZ9zl74 |
| |
| ▲ | wongarsu 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Wow, that certainly gives context to why modern range safety is so strict about automatically or manually blowing the rocket up once it deviates too far from the planned path |
|
|
| ▲ | 866-RON-0-FEZ 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I'm referring to a different Chinese launch failure in 1996. There is some VHS footage on YouTube surreptitiously shot by Americans on-site supporting the payload which became a guerrilla documentary. The village was annihilated but the official number from the CCP was 6 dead. 6. |
| |
| ▲ | audunw 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | It’s not the only time the CCP has reported an unbelievably low number of casualties in a large catastrophe. Seems like the number of dead is always around 6-7 (sorry) no matter how big the incident is. Like the flooding of that tunnel a few years ago where the authorities tried to hide how many flowers were put up by the tunnel | | |
|
|
| ▲ | arjie 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Not this one. An old one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelsat_708 The Chinese government say very few were killed. But personally, my position is that the guys who routinely publish their embarrassing-seeming failures are quite believable (the US publishes that their planes fall off their carriers) and those who say they're perfect are probably lying. So I don't believe their numbers. |