|
| ▲ | rdtsc 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| If anything their one engine out unexpected but successful test boosts their position a bit. |
| |
| ▲ | TheOtherHobbes 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | After separation that turned into all engines out on the booster, so perhaps not. | | |
| ▲ | rdtsc an hour ago | parent [-] | | I meant the engine on the Raptor. But yeah good point about the booster. However that's nowhere near as large of a set back as this explosion |
|
|
|
| ▲ | kortilla 14 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Blowing up on the pad is incredibly worse from a design data collection perspective, a risk to life perspective, and a downstream impact to future launches perspective (nobody can use that site for a couple of months). |
| |
|
| ▲ | testing22321 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| The entire point of SpaceX’s recent launch was an explosion. They were aiming for that outcome. They wanted that outcome. The fact they did it with pinpoint accuracy even with engine issues and an in tact heat shield is a monumental success for a test flight. |
| |
| ▲ | verzali 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | SpaceX also had a massive explosion on the ground not that long ago. | | |
| ▲ | testing22321 11 hours ago | parent [-] | | Absolutely, they were running a test on a test stand. For BO it’s much better to have this now when there is no payload or people on board so they can correct whatever the issue is. |
|
|
