Was that the incident where they stole an artists tiki design?

preinheimer 14 hours ago | parent | next [-]

No, they came up with some legal theory in which they’d bought the assets of some company, including the company’s ownership of some art, but not obligations like paying royalties.

▲

taneq 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That’s like when I got my shower sealed and then it started leaking within the warranty period. The company claimed that they were the new owners and had purchased the business but not the warranty obligations (!) and I’d have to find the original owner and try to make him honour the warranty. Which was complete BS, obviously, but it wasn’t worth taking to court. :/

	▲	sgerenser 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		There actually are legal ways to do that… instead of buying the company, you start a new company, and just buy assets of the old company (e.g. phone numbers, web sites, trademarks, customer lists). Seems shady but apparently it’s pretty common.
	▲	sarchertech 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		A letter from a lawyer or small claims court might be worth it though. It’s not going to take that much of your time, or cost very much.

▲

throwaway85825 14 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Oh yes, the incident with the star wars extended universe authors royalties. Disney is the worst.

▲

Barbing 13 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Perhaps:

“Authors Have Formed a Task Force Because Disney Refuses to Pay Them”

https://bookriot.com/disney-must-pay-task-force/

> Authors like Neil Gaiman have formed a task force to fight for the royalties Disney has refused to pay for Star Wars and other tie-in novels.