As I said in my other reply to you, you go around this post defending B&M with no knowledge of the basic facts of the case. Maybe you should refrain from doing so if you don't know anything about it.

I will not do your work for you. Everything I said is true and easily searchable, feel free to look it up. If you are too stupid to find basic info on a notorious case, again, maybe refrain from talking about shit you know nothing about.

▲

Aurornis 31 minutes ago | parent [-]

> You go around this post defending B&M with no knowledge of the basic facts of the case.

I'm not defending anyone. I'm saying the claims don't line up

> I will not do your work for you. Everything I said is true and easily searchable, feel free to look it up.

Everything I quoted was from me looking it up!

	▲	usehand 18 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		You go around claiming the accusations are "just needless YouTube drama" and that you "wouldn't really trust the YouTube influencers for the whole story". If you think this is not defending the company, then you have some basic communications difficulties. Again, if this is your knowledge after looking it up, then refrain from commenting, as your intelectual limitations will inevitably lead you to make false claims.