> And it seems like the parent company is saying the sets are theirs because the store owed them money, while the Mansells are (correctly) saying consignment means they own the sets, not the franchise.

I read down to where they linked to the store's statement. They said that there's evidence that most of the collection was moved off-site in the past. They said they tried to locate what they could from the inventory list and offer it back, but the person believes they have more.

So yeah, I think there's more to the story. I don't think we're going to get it from the YouTuber making hours of content for it, though.

▲

usehand an hour ago | parent | next [-]

You seem to be all over this thread trying to defend the company LOL Are you B&M corporate? If they have such a solid case, why did they lose the small claims lawsuits?

▲

Aurornis an hour ago | parent | next [-]

I get annoyed when I read a full article and realize I'm not being told the full story.

> If they have such a solid case, why did they lose the small claims lawsuits?

I can't find "small claims" anywhere in the linked article. There's some mention of a "lawsuit loss" but no details, like much of the other key points in the article.

Was this lawsuit against Bricks & Minifigs? Or the old owners? And what was it about?

There are so many people in this thread who seem confident about the facts but can't point to anything other than extremely long YouTube videos

	▲	usehand an hour ago \| parent [-]
		[flagged]

▲

komali2 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Also, what about the false police reports leading to police brutality?

	▲	usehand 9 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		They havent seen any of that! It is so hard to find... No one has time for that when large corp must be defended.

▲

ryandrake an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

You'd think that if there was a side of the story where the details exonerated the company, you'd think they would share those details. If they moved someone else's property out of the store, then surely they would be able to share evidence supporting this.

All we have to go by is the blogger's account, so that's the story. Just saying "there must be more to it" without evidence that there is more to it, is just vague speculation.