Allow me to restate my point: human beings and AI both create via synthesis, but we are the only ones capable of what we could categorize as true original thought or creativity. It could be argued that nothing we do as humans is truly original or creative either, but I would counter that with the claim that an LLM could not have created any element of the society and culture that gave birth to LLMs. Maybe in six more months.

>human beings and AI both create via synthesis, but we are the only ones capable of what we could categorize as true original thought or creativity.

And how is that anything other than synthesis? Do we pull concepts out of thin air?