|
| ▲ | treis 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| There's at least two markets here. Consumer ad driven and worker augmentation markets. Likely a 3rd as a backend infrastructure provider to a bunch of value add companies. I think Google has caught up enough to certainly be a player in the consumer ad driven market. I also don't think only one foundation model adds up. Now that the trail is blazed a dozen companies can likely make a good enough model. The question is if there's a moat to make it winner take all |
|
| ▲ | dchftcs 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| China will make sure they have a frontier lab, there's plenty of chance for Google to catch up once the compute crunch gets more serious. |
| |
| ▲ | TacticalCoder an hour ago | parent [-] | | Google needs to catch up on what? Devs mindshare? The latest Opus 4.8 carefully selected benchmarks made sure to pick Gemini 3.1 Pro and not Gemini 3.5 Flash: 3.5 Flash is beating Opus 4.8 on several of the benchmarks Anthropic posted but simply was ignored. I don't think SOTA-wise Google has a lot of catch up to do. |
|
|
| ▲ | solenoid0937 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Disagree, both are coexisting fine today. |
| |
|
| ▲ | an0malous 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It probably can't support any because there's no moat and smaller, open source models are catching up. This is like investing $1T into mainframe computers in 1980. |
|
| ▲ | dotcoma 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| isn't Google going to win the race anyway ? |
| |
| ▲ | conradkay 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | That feels really hard to argue now that Anthropic/OpenAI are so much bigger How the hell do you crush a ~1T company on the one thing they have all their focus on? |
|
|
| ▲ | watwut 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| If it cant support two competing compamies, something is very wrong. Oligopoly is bad, monopoly worst. Well functioning market is supposed to have many, as in a lot, companies with similar products. To create competition. |