> AI is grown, not built, and like with anything you grow, you'll never be able to predict exactly how it will turn out.

Remember when the frontier labs found out that curated high-quality training was critical to making better models?

Basically, just like high-quality and more education tends to make better humans, on average, I think we can expect quality education to turn out better ai, on average, and with better repeatability than with humans because of better control over the initial conditions and environment.

▲

irishcoffee 4 hours ago | parent [-]

> Basically, just like high-quality and more education tends to make better humans, on average

Much like these models seem to be plateauing, I think there is a cap to the whole “more education makes better humans” and can’t be more apparent than in the US congress and the boatload of C-Suites not actually being very good humans.

What do I know though?

	▲	ninjagoo 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> can’t be more apparent than in the US congress and the boatload of C-Suites not actually being very good humans. Sadly, education does not correct psychopathic traits, which might be overrepresented in c-suites, and selected for in politicians. It might be critical for humanity to identify and edit out these traits in ai, while we can.