| ▲ | Ancalagon an hour ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is society better off? Honest question, you used to be able to support a family of four with a single 9-5. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | bryanlarsen 31 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
And that support was a family of 4-6 in a 1200 sq ft house, eating out <6x a year, vacations were picnics at the local beach, one car that you did your own maintenance on, one tv, only one set of good clothes (your Sunday outfit), et cetera. Most places in the US can still support a family at that same level of expenditure on an average income. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | kylenessen 32 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
My great grandfather supported a family of 7 making brooms. He didn’t own the broom factory. He was an employee, and was paid by the broom. My great grandmother stayed at home to raise 5 children. There was even enough to lend to the local grocery store, apparently. This was at the turn of the 20th century in Canada. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | bwhiting2356 42 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
More household work was done in this era, before grocery stores sold prepared food, before washing machines. And more people lived in less square footage, with grandparents living in the home, less privacy and autonomy. I don't know if we've made the right trade, but it's not the case that a single worker's income was paying for the kind of lifestyle a family of four now has. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | fyrn_ an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders = society. The rest of us are just the help | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||