something something you're paid the amount the market values your work, which in today's job market is an order of magnitude less than the profit you bring the company

▲

r-w 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Well then why make it easy for my work to get devalued? It's not like workers are sitting on the sidelines here, they (I'm aggregate, at least) hold all the power.

	▲	majormajor an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		The US still largely believes everything that Reagan Republicans preached about the "evils" of taxation and regulation of oligarchy, despite the US economy overall (and the "average joe") doing quite well in the era that followed "soak the rich" taxes being passed. So many claims about how it would lead to far better lives for everyone, but the working conditions and general affordability have basically gone down for 40 years. Imagine bringing back the white collar work in the 80s, with a private office with a door, and people whose jobs were to help coordinate and schedule things even if you weren't an exec, instead of you just having a phone to answer all hours of the day.
	▲	codebje an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Sounds like an argument for organised labour to me!

▲

rootusrootus an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

> in today's job market is an order of magnitude less than the profit you bring the company

Then why have we not all been fired already? Sounds like an instant win.

	▲	codebje an hour ago \| parent [-]
		Wouldn't the parent's post mean that you bring profit to the company, but you're worth less than the full amount of that profit because, should you demand to be paid more, you can be replaced by someone who won't demand more. (Has there actually been a lot of terminations in the US tech industry, or is that an odd biasing mechanism causing me to see such things as bigger than they are?)