The idea that you can automatically detect AI generated content seems misguided. It will make mistakes. I think I've heard of things being wrongfully tagged as AI generated on other platforms.

▲

floxy 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I suppose it all depends on the false positive and false negative rates. But better to start now, before AI ruins the platform.

https://web.archive.org/web/20090418141450/http://www.theatl...

▲

luckylion 3 hours ago | parent [-]

_before_? youtube is like the top 1000 creators / influencers / celebrities, 5% actual videos, and the rest is slop of various types for me.

The search is entirely gone and will straight up not list regular content that was made by humans, but it will absolutely surface the cheap AI-voices that can't say HVAC fluently.

Makes sense for youtube, too. For the average person, that seems to be enough, the ads are the same value, and people who dislike that probably have a large overlap with people who use adblockers and don't impulsively spend money on the latest browser-game, miracle cure for cancer, or financial advice from random scammers.

▲

tredre3 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If you only visit youtube.com logged out in a private window, obviously it's going to show you what's the most popular. What else should it be doing?

Personally I never see those top 1000 creators / influencers / celebrities. If anything I find the recommendation algorithm too tuned to my topics of interest so it rarely surfaces new things.

Agreed on the search being less than useless, though.

	▲	intrasight a minute ago \| parent [-]
		I don't only get to YouTube.com from a Google search and that on a browser that I'm not logged into - so it only shows me things that I searched for.

▲

asveikau 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You and I must be watching a very different YouTube. I don't see a lot of AI generated stuff in my recommendations or search.

My teenage daughter gets served a lot of iffy stuff with the ElevenLabs Adam voice though. Though sometimes I suspect some of that content is written manually by people who may not have great English speaking voices, so they add generated audio.

▲

floxy 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Fair enough

▲

Bender 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I know they can identify them because if I click on one by mistake that's all I get until I go to about:blank, close YT tab, clear cache, close browser, run bleachbit and start browser. I never log into their site.

▲

tencentshill 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

So far all it does to the video is add a small tag in the corner. It doesn't affect rankings or monetization. A false positive might annoy some subscribers at worst.

▲

Gigachad 2 hours ago | parent [-]

No one will click a video that has the ai tag though.

▲

Forgeties79 32 minutes ago | parent [-]

I mean this with all sincerity: so what?

If people don’t want to watch AI content, they should be able to avoid it. Just as a vegan should be able to know if a dish is appropriate for them. Besides: if you have to blatantly deceive people into watching your videos when they otherwise would choose not to, what are you even doing? And yes I understand people already do that. But we should not go out of our way to enable that. Plus the moment you are perceived as not disclosing that, you risk getting burned by someone online and facing much harsher, longer term consequences. Reputation still matters to a degree.

Ultimately I’m not sure we should be advocating for opacity in consumer products.

	▲	Gigachad 21 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		I'm just saying there is monetary penalty to having this tag applied, contrary to the parent comment. So mistakenly applying it to a real video would be very detrimental to the creator.