The source was the article in the WSJ itself, which then referred to their source at the Anthropic. Which kind of is a textbook definition of "leak". Because otherwise Anthropic would have their lawyers hunting both the employee breaking their stringent NDA and the WSJ as well...

▲

supern0va an hour ago | parent [-]

Fair enough, but I have to admit I'm puzzled about why you felt the need to then attribute it to Zitron?

▲

hansmayer 39 minutes ago | parent [-]

Why puzzled ? I literally said "According to Ed Zitron", implying that's where I stumbled upon the article. I've no time to read corporate media, at least not regularly.

	▲	supern0va 35 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		>more like their own leak to WSJ and according to Ed Zitron ^ Apologies, the above read to me like you were saying that Ed himself was claiming that Anthropic leaked to the WSJ.