| ▲ | mesmertech 4 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
For coding you always want to go with the best model in the category, not something that would be the best model if we went 1 year back which GLM 5.1 is, and I'm saying that as a big fan of GLM cause I run a translation site where GLM is good enough for the price. Most of the money right now is in coding. Openai and Anthropic just have to be 6 months ahead of SOTA open source models and they'll capture most of the enterprise and dev market | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | binary0010 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes I'm an engineer (20 years most in games/graphics industry) and only use it for code. I've been using glm 5.1 this week a lot. I went in expecting another "decent" but not really "up to standard" open source model. I highly doubt I'll ever use Claude again. I think you are wrong about Claude being any significant level better | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | odie5533 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
If I generate code with Claude, ChatGPT, and GLM 5.1, I can't say which model is which reliably. I exclusively use Claude more out of superstition than reason. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | eikenberry an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> For coding you always want to go with the best model in the category [..] And this is why many companies go out of business. You always want the best bang for your buck, sometimes this is the "best model" and sometimes it is not. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | kgwgk 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
For coding like for everything else in life cost is a factor. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Andrex 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> For coding you always want to go with the best model in the category Will this always be true? There will never be an event horizon/point of diminishing returns where something not-bleeding-edge is "good enough" for 51%+ of users? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | blackjack_ 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This is a silly take. There is a line of "good enough" for most coding (most CRUD apps and APIs are nothing special), and once we are past that, nobody will care about having the "newest, best" model except extreme outliers. And this base "good enough" model will become an ultra cheap commodity as we already see with GLM, deepseek, etc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dogleash 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> For XXX you always want to go with XXX, not XXX Oh, hey, I recognize you. Thank you for the very forward and thorough orbital sander recommendation at Home Depot. That's exactly what I wanted to deal with on my holiday weekend. You just know so much about this and the rest of us are simple passersbys. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | EGreg 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Most work is not coding. And also, people have it wrong… their models are not the main problem anymore. It’s the RAG | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||