| ▲ | postflopclarity 6 hours ago |
| that's a different legal question than the one here. |
|
| ▲ | toast0 5 hours ago | parent [-] |
| This case is specifically about allowing voting for non-resident property owners when the ownership is held by a corporation rather than a natural person. |
| |
| ▲ | postflopclarity 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | correct. and the comment I replied to is about allowing voting for non-resident property owners when the ownership IS held by a natural person. | | |
| ▲ | toast0 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | The poster did not indicate how they hold their ownership. Many people hold their real estate indirectly; a trust is common; if I read the opiniom correctly, a majority of properties in the municipality in question are held in trust. |
|
|
