No one here wants to say it, so I will.

A lot of people are relatively stupid.

If you're not that smart, then it's not worth learning how to do something. Learning is harder and even if you learn about a topic, you can't make use of this knowledge that effectively.

Even more meta, learning how to learn is worth less, since you learn slower.

If that is the case, is it really a bad idea to offload the work onto someone smarter?

It's not PC and it's not a nice thing to think, but if someone is doing it to the point where you think they are being obnoxious, you should probably also consider the possibility that they could do better, but maybe not much better.

▲

intrikate an hour ago | parent [-]

I don't understand the point you're trying to make here. If you don't understand, you aren't smart enough to and shouldn't try? If you learn slow, just stop because you're... slower? What are you talking about?

	▲	wisty 31 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Kind of. Everyone needs to draw a line. Call it an "explore vs exploit" problem, if you want. Sure, you want to fail a bit so you know where the line is, or to push it forwards a bit. But there is, at least in principal, always a line. I'm just saying that if someone draws the line in a place that you think is waaaay too soon, maybe they aren't entirely wrong.