> The UI of that page is so nice

Is it? Seems a text description of "Make a website outlining 'How cooked GitHub' is with a modern style" to basically any LLM would produce exactly that UI and design, literally nothing of that design a human had any influence on, besides the ones selecting what training data the used LLMs was trained with.

I think most of us who've tried using LLMs for web-design can recognize that style and design at this point, regardless of model actually used.

▲

angrydev an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Compared to near unusable pages that large organizations produce, yes this page is highly effective at conveying information. Who cares how it was produced?

	▲	sunrunner 7 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> this page is highly effective at conveying information Is it though? If the page is near unreadable? * Almost pure-black background rendering every not-pure-white colour barely readable * Dark-grey and low saturation colours used almost everywhere, for both fonts and other coloured elements (the orange cells in the calendar are the most readable thing) * Thin fonts - coupled with the dark grey colours this just adds to the readability issues * Yet another incredibly long info-dump of a page And then as far as actual information: * Vanity metrics as the main information, that is a lot of things with no context or historical information * A lot of aggregates and rollups that aren't that useful No, I haven't tried Reader Mode. It's a good demo for UI state syncing though, I'll give it that.
	▲	embedding-shape an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		> Who cares how it was produced? Well, we're at least two people who care, since we were conversing about how good/bad the webdesign is, then you jumped in here :) If you don't care, why bother to reply to people who seemingly do care? What kind of conversation are you expecting here, "Yeah, do tooo"? :\|

▲

Hamuko an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The Bootstrap of 2020s.

	▲	sunrunner 3 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		At least Boostrap pages were readable ;)

▲

olmo23 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

What really grinds my gears is how easy it is to get better designs out of LLMs. But if you don't ask, you get the default.

	▲	hansmayer 22 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Here is a provocative thought - maybe these are the so-called "better designs" from LLMs? It's not like writing English sentences is some huge secret you are sitting on that no one else knows.
	▲	agos 12 minutes ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		what would you ask to get a better design?
	▲	drdrey 22 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		as someone who doesn't know how to get better design out of LLMs, can you elaborate?