| ▲ | pbhjpbhj 14 days ago | |||||||||||||
Are you alleging that California claims stuff to be carcinogenic without evidence? Do you have a supposed motive? Any evidence? Whilst it's a bit of a meme, isn't it just true that a lot of stuff is carcinogenic. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | ceejayoz 14 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
California’s threshold is far too low to be useful. The end result is basically https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alarm_fatigue | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | voakbasda 14 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
Well, the “experts” say a charred steak is carcinogenic. At that point, I stopped listening to anything out of their mouths. It might be true, but it’s also a matter of degree. California has set such a low threshold that one cannot take their label seriously about anything. It applies to nearly everything, making it effectively a useless warning. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | dlcarrier 14 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
Pretty much every state, national, and international health or safety organizations deals with possible carcinogens, or sometimes probable carcinogens, because testing to prove something is a carcinogen is expensive. | ||||||||||||||