| ▲ | ktallett 3 hours ago | |
I don't see the need to become bloated like slack and a one size fits all application. They do a great job with the product they have. Is there anything wrong with just being what you are? Why does the lack of a second act need to be a bad thing if your first product is great and still extremely valuable? I would also if anything put Zoom in with Dropbox, they have a product that is by far the most enjoyable to use in that space, but any other offshoot is not worth it. | ||
| ▲ | bombcar 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Zoom is great, but it's hard to argue for paying $x per user when you're already paying $x per user for email/office and "teams is free". | ||
| ▲ | light_triad 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
[dead] | ||