> at some point in the human civilization journey we'll have to be content with something instead of chasing clouds all the time.

Surely we're not even close to this point though? I can think of a lot of things that would be incredibly good for humanity to have, and which are achievable with enough economic growth, but which we are currently very far from because our economy does not have the necessary productive capacity (for example, enough solar/wind/nuclear/renewable power to completely eliminate our dependence on fossil fuels)

▲

mplewis 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

What does any of that have to do with Dropbox?

	▲	whiplash451 3 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		The point is that we should be directing our energy in a direction that’s net useful for human kind which should translate into growth. Dropbox is not one of those because there are many viable alternatives.
	▲	saghm 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		If we stop chasing clouds, we'll have to go back to local offline storage!

▲

jon-wood 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I mean sure, but marginally better/more profitable file storage isn’t any of that, and artificially juicing the share value doesn’t actually make any difference to the real economy it just makes some people who like gambling on made up numbers happier for a bit.