| ▲ | dingaling 6 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
> "less space than a Nomad" I actually thought that was a valid comment, more so than the Dropbox one. The contemporaneous iPod _was_ technically and acoustically inferior to the Nomad. The iPod "won" on account of fashion, style and marketing. Yes, the Slashdot comment was naive in underestimating or ignoring the power of Apple, but objectively it wasn't wrong. Apple released an inferior product and used out-of-band techniques to sell it. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | mistersquid 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> The contemporaneous iPod _was_ technically and acoustically inferior to the Nomad. You're cherry-picking your "technicals". The click wheel hardware and software implementation (especially the UI response time) was (and still is) revolutionary. iPod won on the technical merits; just not the ones you're focusing. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | 0cf8612b2e1e 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
You have to mention the music store. Prior to that, there were few legal ways to get music to put onto the devices. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Paianni 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
TBF, iPod design was very neat and the nano's were very thin for the time. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | tptacek 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
It's a category error to compare the two comments at all. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||