| ▲ | throwawa1 2 hours ago |
| When I see people making money on Iran attacks, and murder of heads of state - it shows clearly something is deeply wrong with Polymarket. Its a level worse than Vegas or Indian casinos. A literal ticket to hell. I'm all for banning these evil sites. |
|
| ▲ | ifdefdebug 13 minutes ago | parent | next [-] |
| well I see more problematic the people actually doing the Iran attacks and murder of heads of state. Betting on those is distasteful, but doing those things is where the damage lies. |
|
| ▲ | croes 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| something is deeply wrong with some humans |
| |
| ▲ | throwawa1 an hour ago | parent [-] | | Its just a dark mirror episode. I can't imagine waking up and thinking "boy I'll really make some money if we kill Ayatollah Khomeini today" | | |
| ▲ | PowerElectronix an hour ago | parent [-] | | The other side of that argument could be something like: "Dude, Khomeini better not be killed, it'd suck for me, an average iranian dude. I'd probably bet he dies so I can hedge my personal financial wellbeing for that case" | | |
|
|
|
| ▲ | nekzn an hour ago | parent | prev [-] |
| It’s icky to see someone make a moral argument to have something banned, and even worse if they want the government to be the arbiter of morality. Did we really kill God to have some bloodsuckers in suits tell us what’s right and what’s wrong? |
| |
| ▲ | allthetime 39 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | So I take it you have a problem with laws against murder, fraud, theft, etc. Aside from the government, who is it that you prefer to do judgment and enforcement? | | |
| ▲ | nekzn 34 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I’m not saying immoral things can’t be banned. I’m saying that to ban something we must be able to construct an argument that does not hinge on morality. For example, theft is bad because it deprives you of your possessions. No need to invoke morality. And yes, you can construct an argument to ban polymarket that does not rely on morality too. But don’t try to sell it to me with a “we will ban it because it’s eeeeevil”. | | |
| ▲ | FabHK 9 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | > to ban something we must be able to construct an argument that does not hinge on morality. For example, theft is bad because it deprives you of your possessions. No need to invoke morality. Ok, I'll bite. Why is it bad to deprive you of your possessions? And given that the house always wins, is it not depriving the gamblers of their possessions? | |
| ▲ | noIdeaTheSecond a minute ago | parent | prev [-] | | [dead] |
|
| |
| ▲ | nyeah 39 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If your argument supports "murder for hire should be legal," then the problem is your argument. | |
| ▲ | canelonesdeverd 44 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | >It’s icky to see someone make a moral argument to have something banned Which are valid arguments in your opinion? |
|
