| ▲ | thepaulmcbride 2 hours ago |
| We’ve had GitHub actions for long enough, it’s time for GitHub consequences. |
|
| ▲ | cyanydeez 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| >Copilot: Do you want me to implement consequences for you or babble on and on about what might entirely be a figment of your imagination (Github is up and you're on a 48 hour bender without sleep) |
|
| ▲ | pnvdr 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| i would like to see consequences for "secure sleep" XD. |
|
| ▲ | shevy-java an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I think this can only happen if there are viable alternatives. For instance, the UI at setups such as https://git.devuan.org/Daemonratte/gtk2-ng is quite ok-ish, in my opinion. Granted, it is mostly copy/paste from github but that still is about 1000000x better than sourceforge's interface - and gitlab's UI too (I just hate gitlab's UI, they seem to love complexity and a billion features only 0.000001% ever need; GitHub, with all its faults, is for the most part really simple - not everywhere, e. g. GitHub wiki setup sucks, but by and large I think it is simple overall). |
| |
| ▲ | danudey an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Github definitely has the better UI but if it weren't for network effects I'd be pushing to migrate to Gitlab pretty hard. | | |
| ▲ | Bnjoroge an hour ago | parent [-] | | Gitlab’s UI is extremely terrible. It’s hard to even explain how bad it is. | | |
| ▲ | dilawar 42 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Once you get used to it, it's not so bad which is probably true for all functional UIs. I switch between gitlab and GitHub quite a lot and I can't say which one is objectively better. I do like that cross-linking is easier in GitHub but I prefer gitlab ci over GitHub actions. Too bad that gitlab ci runner has removed the command to run ci locally but third party foss solutions are there. |
|
| |
| ▲ | wongarsu an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | If replacing github wholesale isn't viable, how does the story for replacing GitHub Actions look like currently? I don't remember the pre-Github-Actions days of everyone using CircleCI with a github integration in a negative light. I've noticed that since then a couple of CI providers have sprung up that differentiate themselves with faster build speeds, but I haven't really kept up with that market | |
| ▲ | joshuanapoli an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | I've been thinking of reverting back to Circle CI. |
|
|
| ▲ | thesurlydev 44 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] |
| "A little less conversation, a little more action please" |
