| ▲ | zarzavat 2 hours ago | |
`history.back()` shouldn't even exist, it's almost never correct to use it instead of a logical back button that works on the logical navigation structure e.g. going up a level, or to the previous page, etc. For example, if you are on Page 5, then pressing "back" inside the app should always take you to Page 4. `history.back()` could take you to any page, it's unpredictable. | ||
| ▲ | pibaker 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Disagreed. In everyday speech "going back" means going to where you came from. If I'm at a friend's place at 123 Main Street and I tell him I'm going back, what I'm saying is I'm heading back to my home, not to 122 Main Street. The web should work similarly. And the idea of logical navigation is flawed because most websites don't have a well defined logical structure, nor is it feasible to have one. What is the previous page of a Wikipedia article, or an HN submission, or an Amazon listing, or a search result of cheapest direct flights between New York and Cancun? With how the back button currently works, at least there is consistency in what to expect when clicking it. Under your suggestion, there is no way a user knows what the back button does on each website unless he clicks on it first and find out himself. | ||
| ▲ | kcrwfrd_ 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
It’s really common that you can arrive on a view from different places. For example on instagram you might click through to a post from the explore page or from someone sending it to you via DM. In either case pressing the back button rendered in the app, or swiping back, will take you back to where you came from. It feels natural and seamless. Although I guess there are other ways to skin that cat than history.back() But I agree with you when there’s a clear hierarchy. Like on a job ad a “back” button should just be a normal link to the index of job openings. | ||