If I followed, Rust's memory safety guarantee means sacrificing roughly ~3% performance with some worst case paths being ~15% (compared to C++ performance)?

▲

marcosdumay 7 hours ago | parent [-]

That's on the typical performance for bounds checking in C too.

But no, "memory safety" includes most of the things discussed on the slides, and those number are for bounds checking only.

	▲	encodedrose 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Ah, I was using GH's webui instead of downloading to view the PDF and it stopped loading at slide#47...rereading it now paints a much better picture. Thanks!