yes, because as we know from history without agents there is no internet or technology or anything

What do you mean?

I'm saying that AI is going to develop software from here on. I don't think you can expect that a human is going to review every line of code. Not that it's good, but that's just how it is. It's not so different from manufacturing. A human is not reviewing every weld. I see a lot of sloppy beads, but in a lot of cases, it's good enough.

▲

tmp10423288442 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> A human is not reviewing every weld.

On civil engineering projects, I’m pretty sure a human reviews each weld. For mass-produced things, maybe not, although a company would not look good in a lawsuit if they had inadequate inspection procedures which allowed a fault causing injury or death to occur.

	▲	youre-wrong3 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		> On civil engineering projects, I’m pretty sure a human reviews each weld. Nope. It’s sampled.

▲

conartist6 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm saying that's self-evidently ludicrous. Software is not like welding. Do you think Notch could have become rich and famous by welding? How about Bill Gates, famous as a really consistent welder?

▲

bigstrat2003 an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

There's no way that AI develops software from now on. It isn't remotely good enough for that, nor has it really gotten better in the past few years. We're going to see a push to use AI, then a move away from it once the dreadful quality of AI slop becomes too obvious to ignore.