It's alarming how people are willing to overlook the obvious in-your-face sloppiness of the Bun rewrite. A million lines of code in 9 days, pushed to main branch, forced on the existing userbase irresponsibly.

Nobody understands the code, nor will they be able to maintain it without AI service as an external dependency. Give me a break, I'm not running that monstrosity on my machine. Everyone running production software should move away from Bun purely as a technical decision.

▲

j_bum 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Do you use Claude code on your machine? That seems mostly vibe coded

▲

sleples 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

1. I don't use Claude Code, no.

2. It's amazing that a CLI wrapper is as buggy as it is.

3. Nevertheless, it's useable, and maybe for a CLI that's enough. I don't want a JS runtime running production to be the same mess.

▲

wiseowise 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Claude Code isn’t a runtime that I use to execute my code with.

▲

brabel 5 hours ago | parent [-]

If you use it to write code for you, then it kind of is, indirectly.

	▲	dbalatero 17 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		That is quite the stretch you're making.

▲

skeeter2020 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

that seems comparable to taking a dev-time dependency, while bun is a runtime dependency. THey need to be treated very differently.