| |
| ▲ | singpolyma3 3 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Um. Yes. Those are obviously contradictory. | |
| ▲ | lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I think I see where you're coming from. To use an example, Switzerland has tight immigration controls due to the policies which grant citizens and permanent residents certain welfare benefits, since they don't want those to be leeched by people who do not contribute as much back. That is against immigration while not being anti-immigrant; the point is that the immigration itself does not motivate the policy which limits immigration, instead being motivated by the existence and meaning of other policies (a kind of protectionism). Tying this back to OP's comment, it's hard to see these policy changes as any sort of legitimate protectionism and it's just as hard to divorce them from the justifications given by people who start with "I'm not anti-immigrant". | |
| ▲ | throwawaypath 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | singpolyma3 2 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | If the borders are often then no one is coming in illegally | |
| ▲ | convolvatron 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | there are quite a number of issues with the situation as it was evolved. lots of people are intersted as a matter of policy in admitting that the US is largely functional because of immigrant labor, but relying in illegal immigration to fill those roles hasn't been great for the structure of the country or the laborers themselves. and to be clear this is not just harvesting the crops, and raisin the children, and building the houses, its also doctors and engineers and all sort of other professions. so there a huge need to have a difficult policy discussion about what to do without cratering the economy. but when you start removing civil liberties and running around in gangs grabbing random brown people off the streets and sending them to indefinate detention in the middle of nowhere, dumping people in Somalia, claiming you have the right kill anyone you want, you shouldn't be surprised when people start waving around the f word. | | |
| ▲ | throwawaypath 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | >but when you start removing civil liberties and running around in gangs grabbing random brown people off the streets and sending them to indefinate detention in the middle of nowhere, dumping people in Somalia, claiming you have the right kill anyone you want, you shouldn't be surprised when people start waving around the f word. You've been propagandized to believe that is happening. Remember when we were grabbing random brown people, including Black Olympian school superintendents right off the streets and sending them to concentration camps? https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/27/us/ian-roberts-des-moines-sup... Months later the truth comes out: illegal alien with guns in his possession, which is a federal crime. Deportation order issued under Biden's administration. The post-truth era has made the f word effectively meaningless. | | |
| ▲ | jazzypants an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Maybe they saw the roving bands of masked militants roaming the streets and grabbing people without warrants with their own eyes like I did. | |
| ▲ | SpicyLemonZest 33 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Sending masked goons to pull people off the streets is unconditionally fascist, and the people who participated are criminals who all belong in prison. If some of the goons were particularly conscientious and never arrested someone without good cause, that's great, and perhaps if they prove that we can shorten their sentences. |
|
|
|
|
