Remix.run Logo
EA 3 hours ago

The tiles ablate. The shuttle returned from every mission with missing tiles.

jordanb 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Shuttle's tiles not being durable as hoped is what killed it's turnaround time.

The problem was never solved and turned what was supposed to be a few days into weeks or months. Every mission the shuttle had to go back into the assembly building and have all tiles inspected and potentially replaced.

dnautics 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Shuttle tiles were also unique per position and starship tiles have a few base forms that are interchangeable

amluto 2 hours ago | parent [-]

I would also believe that a robot could inspect and replace tiles a lot faster than humans.

sidewndr46 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Well, every mission that it returned from it had missing tiles. That is not the same thing as returning from every mission.

throwaway85825 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

The shuttle required long expensive refurbishment after each flight.

b112 an hour ago | parent [-]

Just made me realise, this is just like the F-35.

Its turn around time is ridiculous, it has to be maintained with specialized equipment/hangers, along with external contractor assistance.

Compared to the Gripen, as an example, which can land on a freeway and be up in the air again in a few minutes.

One was designed to be used in war, in desperate scenarios, with no ability to coddle it. The other, the F-35? Is designed around milking the taxpayer as much as possible, and employing people in as many politician's states as possible.

The shuttle was like that, I think. Which is really sad.