| ▲ | NkVczPkybiXICG 2 hours ago | |
Why does the title say 1ns but the body of the article says 30ns (with hopes to eventually get it down to 5)? | ||
| ▲ | geerlingguy an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |
The 2nd revision of the hardware is 1ns in simulation, likely 5ns in real-world scenarios. The first revision of the hardware (which I saw at NAB) is more like 30ns (with 20ps jitter, I believe). 1ns is about the best you can do with the nearly 1 GHz carrier (as mentioned in a sibling comment). | ||
| ▲ | larpingscholar 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
It's the period of the carrier wave (900MHz)? | ||