>Using a wealth tax to nationalize corporations sounds like exactly what we should be doing.

You want Trump and company in charge of it all? Or are we finally back to "the next time Democrats win it will be forever!" wishful thinking? I mean, even if you want to nationalize everything, it's as if you dreamt up the worst possible way to go about doing that so that they've cratered first and started hemorrhaging all their talent in the leadup.

▲

QuercusMax an hour ago | parent [-]

So let's not even think about how to build a better world because the administration we have right now is garbage?

We need a wealth tax, ONLY public financing of elections (no PAC money, no "I'm a billionaire so I can spend as much as I want on myself"), and many other reforms. Nationalizing critical industries and sectors is also something we should be pursuing.

	▲	randallsquared 40 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		From the standpoint of 1926, we built the better world and you're living in it. It's hard to imagine how much better off we all are, but it's not a law of nature, and with enough damage to markets and production, we can get back there again!
	▲	sokoloff 42 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		> no "I'm a billionaire so I can spend as much as I want on myself" To me, that would seem extremely difficult for Congress to pass a law restricting individual speech in this particular way that would pass First Amendment muster, and I don’t think we should be at “let’s just set aside the Constitution when it clearly says something we don’t like” because I don’t think that ends well in today’s political climate (or any other, but it’s especially bad now).