| ▲ | colordrops 2 hours ago | |
You are putting words in my mouth, I never said anything about such a stance. The vast majority of new software is written using AI. The problem is not that it is written by AI, but rather than some people treat it like a black box. It is entirely possible to use AI to write code and verify that it is correct. Even Linus Torvalds is allowing AI generated code into the Linux kernel as long as it's managed properly. | ||
| ▲ | happytoexplain an hour ago | parent [-] | |
>The vast majority of new software is written using AI. The problem is not that it is written by AI How on earth does this follow? It's common, so it should be accepted without scrutiny? >The problem is not that it is written by AI, but rather than some people treat it like a black box. Yes, and guns don't kill people. Obviously the issue has two facets. It would be irrational to say "AI is flawless" or "humans are flawless". Allowing genAI code does not imply blindly trusting genAI code. >as long as it's managed properly. Correct. Hence the issue. This was vibe-coding by even the strictest definitions of the term. Vibe-coding is, by definition, not "properly managed". | ||