98.6% cache hits doesn't distinguish an efficient workflow from an overly chatty linear agent repeatedly reusing the same context. Plus, it says nothing directly that the process has good useful progress per token.

▲

kridsdale1 16 hours ago | parent [-]

We are all going to be graded by (tickets closed / tokens burned) soon enough.

	▲	recursive 16 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Sweet. I can get that up to infinity, assuming they're using IEEE-754 division.
	▲	nchie 4 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I doubt it, the difference between someone slightly inefficient and someone extremely efficient isn't big enough to matter compared to how much they cost in salary.