new | show | ask | jobs Github

Scarbutt 2 hours ago

Surprised Anthropic hasn't done anything to restrict Claude Code from using other providers.

▲

wolttam 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The value of Claude Code the harness isn't that great. There's a lot of other good harnesses out there.

▲

chandureddyvari an hour ago | parent | next [-]

What’s your favourite harness? Is there any benchmarks for harness like LLMs have for swe verified?

	▲	wolttam 5 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		You can check my profile for which one I like most :) I do think there have been efforts to benchmark different harnesses. Personally I'm not going to choose one harness or another based on +/- a few percentage points in a benchmark. I'm going to use one the one that I find the most ergonomic, that isn't too bloated, etc. The models are the primary lever, not the harness.

▲

rane an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I thought so, and then I tried Opencode and Codex and started to appreciate Claude Code a lot more. They've actually done great work with the small details.

▲

koolba 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Good or better? Curious which would be in either bucket.

	▲	wolttam 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Probably a matter of taste. I prefer the harness I wrote, I don't want to go near Anthropic's bloated mess of a harness with a 10-meter pole.

▲

crooked-v an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

And it gets dragged down by Anthropic actively injecting unhelpful things into prompts without telling users about them (https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/58262).

▲

cortesoft 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

At this point in the AI wars, it is probably better to have more users of Claude code rather than restrict which LLMs it can connect to. Claude code is probably (currently at least) stickier than the LLM model itself. Getting people into the Claude code ecosystem is worth it.

Later, they can always lock it down more or add Claude LLM only features to it.