At first glance, it looks similar to Conductor (https://www.conductor.build/). It seems like a lot of these tools are converging on the same general ideas.

Could you share a comparison with the other tools out there?

▲

collin128 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Note that Anthropic specifically called out that usage through Conductor will be metered as "programmatic usage" in their June 15th pricing change: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48126438

	▲	walthamstow an hour ago \| parent [-]
		My colleagues are planning to get around this by using Conductor's big terminal mode. At which point I think it's basically just a git worktree manager?

▲

avipeltz 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

yeah there is a lot of overlap, we are more terminal first than conductor so you can do can use any cli agent you want. We have a lot more quality of life features around the terminal like notifications, and some things similar to tmux where if you kill the app or update your sessions stay alive and running. We also recently released remote workspaces so you can setup cloud workspaces for your agents. Id say if you like the chat experience conductor is still a bit more polished, we'll get to that level of polish soon, but if you care more about the terminal and cloud and more new integrations we are shipping superset is better.

▲

jnovek 5 hours ago | parent [-]

When you say “terminal first”, are you terminal-first enough that I could use vim buffers for editing?

	▲	hoakiet98 5 hours ago \| parent [-]
		yes, it's essentially a terminal with extra agent hooks tracked and more customized review flow. if it runs in a terminal it runs in Superset.