Stealing every intellectual property on the planet to build a plagiarism machine that is wrong 10% of the time, could be interpreted as a scam by many folks.

▲

BobbyJo 24 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Is there anyway to build intelligence that doesn't meet the definition of plagiarism you are using here?

I remember when IP laws were looked at like a form of oppression in the tech community...

	▲	comfysocks 2 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		To me, the problem is when IP laws are stretched and abused by big corporations (like, say Disney) or by patent trolls. If IP laws could work in a way that gave limited and reasonable protections to actual creators and innovators, then I don’t have a problem with them.
	▲	Craighead 10 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		ahh yes the perfect world fallacy

▲

stalfie 41 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That sentence could easily be applied to the human baseline.

	▲	Keyframe 36 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Yes, if you're equating same rights to soulless corporations and humans as well as their motives.

▲

warkdarrior 4 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

What exactly is your complaint about Anna's Archive?

▲

anuramat 31 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

> wrong 10% of the time

that doesn't sound nearly as bad as you think it does; I don't see how ethics are relevant here either, unless oil is also somehow a scam

regardless, one must be delusional to deny the fact that it's useful tech

"but they're evil" is not an argument