Antigravity may well Top the whatever benchmark but:

My Antigravity (forced) replacement for Gemini CLI requires me to log on via browser every time I use it, and my Antigravity IDE won't update at all, so:

If it's ok I'd prefer they just work on reaching a baseline acceptable rollout before worrying about being Top in anything.

Ps actual title:

OpenSCAD LLM Benchmark: Building the Pantheon

▲

jetter 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I agree, my main concern regarding Google AI products is this endless pain around the UX of login / billing / upgrades / product sunsets... but their LLM models are good and Antigravity 2.0 is not that bad either (unless you lost all you Antigravity 1.0 setup and projects - like many people did)

▲

pelagicAustral 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I just use Claude Code and intellij, so I don't understand why so many people complain about Antigravity ditching VS Code, what's the surface not covered by using Antigravity CLI + VS Code (or any other IDE)?

▲

jeromegv 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Gemini cli was open source. Antigravity cli is not. Not at feature parity, missing many features and now we are forced to migrate away from Gemini cli before anti gravity cli is ready.

	▲	surajrmal 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The difference in its ability is immense. Even with less features it makes a lot of sense to switch. It really shows how much the harness matters almost equally to the model.

▲

freedomben 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I'm not GP, but I am somewhat excited about antigravity CLI. I adopted Gemini CLI early and really liked it, though over time it got dumber and dumber until a point when I realized it was foolish to use it instead of claude/codex. I'm hopefuly that antigravity CLI won't go through that path, but also can't fight a skepticism.

▲

jeromegv 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I don’t think it’s the cli that was dumber, just the model it was using. They drastically reduced limits on their best model so that’s likely how you got stuck downgrading model and getting worse results.

	▲	WarmWash an hour ago \| parent [-]
		I'm sensing in reality that behind the scenes there is a difficult trade-off between quantization and usage limits. You can have a "smart" model but poor limits, or good limits and a "dumb" model. This seems very similar to mobile data limits (remember those years?), where there wasn't enough tower bandwidth to serve everyone unlimited data, so telecos were in constant tension between data caps and bandwidth throttling. It wasn't until 5G came along with 100x network capacity that they could finally give everyone "unlimited" data.

▲

VectorLock 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The forced upgrade from Gemini CLI which I liked as much, and as some ways better than Claude Code was bad. But them just sending out that email on Wednesday that basically said "Thanks for subscribing to Google One AI Pro, as of right now we're adding limits to your account. Tough shit you get nothing." left a REALLY bad taste in my mouth. I had previously praised the "AI Pro" subscription as a good value.

	▲	leoedin 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I quit AI Pro earlier this year for the same reason. I went to use it one day (I don't think I'd even used it much in the preceding week) and found that my limits had been reduced overnight and my usage was already too high. I had something like a 7 day wait until it reset. I get you have to change limits, but reducing limits in a way which both applies retroactively and has a really long reset period is just infuriating. If they'd applied the new limits more gently or at the next billing period I'd probably have continued paying. I don't mind paying a fair price for a service that provides value, but I really hate having a service I think I'm paying for rug-pulled with no clear justification.

▲

freedomben 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Having my workflow disrupted is the main reason I never adopted Antigravity, despite liking it. I'm glad to see G is invested, but the older I get the more protective I am of my workflow.

	▲	hootz 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		And the only realistic way to protect our workflow is by avoiding vendor lock-in like the plague.

▲

the_real_cher 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Wild that it doesn't cache the creds.

	▲	elaus 4 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Just to clarify: I believe it should cache them (it works for me). So far I like it much more than Gemini CLI (my previous daily driver for personal projects). Seems more mature and "feels more intelligent" (very subjective ofc)
	▲	littlecranky67 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		My (unfounded) guess is this is to prevent usage by other tools/openclaw. The browser login will have a fingerprinting to make sure you are a human.

▲

stuaxo 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

"Pantheon" bloody hell, why is it people writing these articles are so up themselves, it's so overbearing.

	▲	tpmoney 3 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The article is literally about asking these models to generate 3d models of the Pantheon.