| ▲ | grumbel an hour ago | |||||||||||||
I am a little worried that this is still a problem after 20 years. Don't they have simulators to test every weird and unexpected road condition offline? And flooded roads aren't exactly an unusual event to begin with. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | krackers an hour ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
They can simulate "driving out of a raging fire" but not a flooded street? This seems like an admission that the fancy "world model simulation" doesn't actually mean much https://waymo.com/blog/2026/02/the-waymo-world-model-a-new-f... | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | marcosdumay 30 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
It can just mean that nobody though about flooded streets, what's way more reasonable than it seems because of the birthday paradox. But that also means they need a long time to adapt to a new situation. That may be very bad depending on how fine grained a situation is defined, or it may mean nothing and in a few months they'll be back without problems. | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | burnte an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
In ATL this happens often enough that it's not a shock when it happens, we have lots of drainage problems here. I agree that I would have assumed Waymo had tested in events like this, but clearly not. So what I can say is running in ATL is a great test case for these events, and also the people who live here don't do a better job than Waymo did. There were dozens of people who ruined their cars yesterday trying to drive through deep water. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | outside2344 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
The fact that they aren't a usual event is probably exactly the challenge here. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||