| ▲ | unethical_ban 2 hours ago | |
If we accept that ALPR have a place in society, the data needs the same level of narrow scope and judicial process that other personal tracking data has. I don't care what the precedent is for regular cameras: AI-enabled facial/ALPR tracking is highly invasive action by the government and should be regulated as such. You want to search a database? Go to a judge, give your probable cause, get approval. No exceptions and no automated aggregation of tracking across jurisdictions. | ||
| ▲ | ghthor an hour ago | parent [-] | |
That’s all well and good, but making that dataset also means it will be leaked | ||