Remix clone Hacker News

new | show | ask | jobs Github

▲

chii 2 hours ago

equality of outcome is unnecessary, only equality of opportunity is required.

▲

oblio 2 hours ago | parent [-]

So if the apples are in a 3.5m high tree and you're 2m tall and I'm 1.5m tall, it's fair if we both get 1m ladders?

▲

chii 2 hours ago | parent [-]

why isnt it fair?

Someone taller has a better chance at becoming a pro basketball player. Shorter people are not given more leeway. But both tall and short people have the chance to try out (at least on paper).

▲

yifanl 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Because the equivalence between being signed for the NBA and having apples to eat is nonsensical. We accept some things being unfair, not everything being unfair.

	▲	linkregister 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Fixating on apples is key to the metaphor. The shorter person has other opportunities to collect food that they are better suited for, e.g. picking strawberries.
	▲	tristor 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		> We accept some things being unfair, not everything being unfair. Life is fundamentally unfair. Anything that tips the balance in the other direction is due to specific, continuous human effort. It's a good thing when we can make things more fair, but the inherent unfairness of life is not a cosmic injustice.