I’ve been thinking of a proof-of-work scheme for accessing content where you effectively need to mine some crypto for the author, but, this idea might not fly today

▲

dpark an hour ago | parent | next [-]

This is already a thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anubis_(software)

▲

wolttam 23 minutes ago | parent [-]

Yes, but:

> Although Anubis could be altered to mine cryptocurrency to serve as proof of work, Iaso has rejected this idea: "I don't want to touch cryptocurrency with a 20 foot pole."

Which in my mind is a shame. Crypto is an absolute mess, yes, but this seems like an elegant way to get something back for putting things out there.

	▲	vitally3643 7 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Mining crypro doesn't materialize money. You have to exchange it for real money which means taking a private individual's money in exchange for scam tokens. This is the problem crypto fans refuse to acknowledge. The money doesn't magically appear, you're taking it from someone else and letting them hold the bag when whatever cryptocurrency you choose inevitably blows up, fails, or rug-pulls. It's unethical to engage with at all because you're still participating in scamming real money out of private individuals
	▲	dpark 16 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		The problem is that much of the cost is borne by humans accessing the sites. People generally get real mad when they find out you’re using their computers to mine crypto.

▲

microtonal 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

But that will be a hassle for human visitors as well. A web doing proof-of-work to browse, will be a disaster for phones with their limited batteries, etc.

▲

odo1242 2 hours ago | parent [-]

To be specific, it would be more of a hassle for human visitors than for the AI companies with infinite money and specialized browsers.

	▲	wolttam 21 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		The idea would be that AI companies would still be forced to do this proof of work. Anubis proved the idea

▲

chii 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

or you know, just charge for your content if you believe it to be valuable enough for the fee being charged.

	▲	wolttam 19 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Yes, but that tends to limit the reach of your content. Hence why a lot of people reach for ads. Between seeing ads and doing a little bit of proof-of-work for the author, I'd choose the latter.