No, it's more that Gemini models are simply not very good for coding compared to the top two. Even with Antigravity I use Claude models.

▲

pelorat 28 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Depends on the language. Gemini and Claude are far superior when it comes to C# for instance, compared to anything that OAI offers.

▲

fluffyspork 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Gemma 4 31b is better for coding than Gemini in my limited testing on a small C project single source file project, less than 1000 lines. Setting temperature to 0 gives better results for me. It seems like Gemini ignores the system prompt more and the default reasoning output seems more incoherent.

	▲	_fat_santa 44 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Their open weight on device models are really impressive. Partly because I think they are the only ones out of all the frontier labs even working on local models.
	▲	onlyrealcuzzo an hour ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		> Gemma 4 31b is better for coding than Gemini Is there a fine-tuned Gemma coding model? I'd assume that would perform quite well.