| ▲ | echelon 3 hours ago |
| I'm in film and highly exposed to the AI media and arts scene. I was very early to this hate, and I've experienced it personally by the metric boat load. I'm fine with people not liking the technology, but the number of death threats, rude comments ("your mother didn't use the coat hanger well enough"), and literal stalking and doxxing I've received from some of these rabidly anti-AI people is appalling. Whatever compels people to throw paint onto fine art or to block traffic for hours (including emergency vehicles and people just trying to get home) is the same bug a lot of these anti-AI griefers have. I take great joys when luminaries in animation, illustration, game development, etc. announce that they're using AI tools and that they enjoy them. It's one of my sweetest pleasures after enduring the anti-AI outrage day in and day out for years. |
|
| ▲ | justonepost2 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| It will take a few years for the multigenerational dark age to set in, but eventually you too will realize that they had a point. |
| |
| ▲ | jasonlotito 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Give me one anti-AI point that is ignored and/or not considered by "pro-AI" groups. I'm genuinely curious what it is. | | |
| ▲ | justonepost2 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I don’t know or particularly care what “anti-AI” thought leaders think. I don’t get my views from a camp. The person above believes that in a year, or 3 years, or 10 years that they will remain an “operator” of the AI, and that their creativity will be amplified at the expense of the dumb luddites who will be left in the dust. Very common in tech, more disappointing in the arts. This is incorrect - we will in short order on the current trajectory see cognitive “dark factories” announced by hyperscalers or labs that produce an infinite stream of content, or software, or anything else and rapidly outcompete all human endeavor. To some this is Human Progress, to me it’s a dark age. | | |
| ▲ | jasonlotito 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | > I don't know You said it. > or particularly care what "anti-AI" thought leaders think. I don't get my views from a camp. You said this: "they had a point." So, "I don't know or particularly care what "anti-AI" thought leaders think." is clearly a lie. > I don't get my views from a camp. But you speak on it? Gotcha. > we will in short order on the current trajectory see cognitive "dark factories" announced by hyperscalers or labs that produce an infinite stream of content, or software, or anything else and rapidly outcompete all human endeavor. To think yourself so pathetic and useless is sad. Regardless, my request remains unfulfilled. > To some this is Human Progress, to me it's a dark age. Why do you welcome it? | | |
| ▲ | justonepost2 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I made a specific point, you didn’t like it. I’m not saying this from some sort of inferiority complex, it is literally a product category that is probably going to be announced in an OpenAI blog post in the next 12-24 months or at the next Google IO. > why do you welcome this? I… don’t… |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | stuartjohnson12 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I do think that AI tools make creativity better and not worse. I grew up with Youtube poops, photoshop, garry's mod, and flash. Being able to go from idea to asset in a fast, throwaway capacity lets you nuance and remix jokes and media on a level that isn't possible with traditional creative software. I got into software because I wanted to make things that I wanted. I think it is a great thing that the ability to make software is now in the hands of more people than ever, just as 3D printing did for widgets, as cheap chinese manufacturing did for electronics, diffusion models are doing for media. Media production is often laborious and unfun. I learned that the hard way the first time I whipped out the physgun in Garry's Mod and started trying to make something funny. That experience was absolutely buns and the consequence is I didn't get to make as many fun things to share and enjoy as I could have. My suspicion is that the people leading the outrage from a creative perspective is people who were, by-and-large, struggling/failing to make it in a creative industry before AI, and this is the outlet for that pent up frustration. The closest I've come to sympathising has been witnessing the death of the farmer's market under a sea of generic AI slop and Temu garbage. And while sad, that feels like more of a story about globalising supply chains than one about the death of creativity. The pessimism of Blueskyism feels very alien to me. |
| |
| ▲ | spaqin 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Funny, growing up in the same world I'm coming to the exact opposite view - instead of unique poops and kids using limited tools in the most creative ways, we'll be getting rehashes of everything, looking mostly the same. Yes, media production is not fun. And that's what we as humans value in art - the labor. Easy things don't impress us. And by sticking to the default, easy option, with barely any good reason to embrace the suck and learn the difficult tools and processes, I can only see decline. | | |
| ▲ | stuartjohnson12 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I recently saw a funny video on TikTok of someone's proposal where the man was lunging weirdly far forward in order to present the ring. The comment section was full of AI-generated edits to this image which exaggerated it or changed the setting in various creative ways - making his leg even longer, making his leg extend over a giant chasm, adding a bench behind him so he was performing a Bulgarian split squat. I giggled my way through the comments. This form of humor - of being able to take human in-jokes and run with them - was not possible before artificial intelligence, and it was very funny! Memes are about to get so much more varied and funny as the effort requirement drops. We're nowhere near the effort ceiling in terms of making great memes, most people just simply do not have the time, resources or patience to actualise their mind's eye. It reminded me of exactly the kind of dumb joke and rehashing that made YTPs so special in the first place. I don't know if this is high art, but it is art, and I don't think YTPs were a particularly special form of comedy outside of our rose-tinted memories of childhood. There's still the capacity for human labor and uniqueness to be embedded in AI-generated media - only the first breaths of low-quality algoslop lacked that. Expression and mimetics will change, and I think children born today will get to enjoy richer and funnier content than we did now that they are unshackled from GMod stop motion. | |
| ▲ | fluffybucktsnek 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I don't think people value labor. Failed delayed games serve as examples. I think it's more of the case that labor is correlated with uniqueness. And I think uniqueness is closer to what people are truly looking for in art. |
| |
| ▲ | chasd00 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I was president of a neighborhood association in an entertainment district in Dallas TX some years ago ( Deep Ellum ). The group worked really hard to get Deep Ellum out of nasty downturn and bring new business to the neighborhood. We got a lot of push back from people wanting Deep Ellum to return to the way it was in the late 90s. That was impossible, nothing will ever return to the WayItWas(tm). What I realized was a lot of those voices wanted their lives to be like it was in the late 90s, it had nothing to do with the neighborhood, it was them. I think many people who get the angriest are actually angry with themselves and not the issue du jour. |
|
|
| ▲ | jasonlotito 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I think the most challenging part about these people is that it makes it so much harder to address real concerns with AI. I use it, but even I recognize that it needs to be considered carefully. I've been lucky in that most people who use AI that I've encountered have been willing to have great conversations on the pros and cons, the concerns, etc. However, the moment som anti-AI person comes in, they immediately want to go scorched earth. I just wished they'd use even half this energy for something more impactful. |
|
| ▲ | righthand 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Being upset about blocked traffic for a protest but not upset that the rich are trying to kill off the labor market is the exact hilariously short sighted issue. |
| |
| ▲ | echelon 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | > kill off the labor market This is such a comical take. There is going to be more demand, not less. And hypothetically, if they did kill off the labor market, they did it in the wrong country. Everyone here owns guns. Work will be fine. | | |
| ▲ | justonepost2 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > There is going to be more demand, not less. Every time. Shake an AI optimist and you find an AI skeptic. | |
| ▲ | righthand 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Everyone here owns guns? I think you might want to check your stats on that. There is going to be more demand for labor? How? Most of our economy right now is leveraged toward building data centers, that’s infinite growth? When it drops off you think the mass layoffs from the last half-decade wont continue? Do you think everyone is going to shift into painting? Please enlighten us with how the demand for labor will increase miraculously when all the implementers are aligned to decrease it. |
|
|