Remix.run Logo
satvikpendem 4 hours ago

Interesting what the disconnect is between what the vocal minority say about AI versus the vast majority who use it every day and do not care, such as coders and even regular people, as ChatGPT has almost a billion users.

Lambdanaut 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I'm not sure what you mean because you didn't actually say it, but AI is polling as one of the most disliked topics in the USA right now. More hated than ICE.

Source: https://pos.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/260072-NBC-March-...

TOMDM 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> AI is polling as one of the most disliked topics in the USA right now. More hated than ICE.

I don't think your source substantiates that.

From your source:

ICE

Somewhat negative: 9%

Very negative: 47%

AI

Somewhat negative: 24%

Very negative: 22%

redwall_hp 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Pew Research highlights:

* A majority of Americans consider the risk of AI to society high, a minority consider the benefits high

* A majority are more concerned than excited about AI

* Americans feel strongly that it’s important to be able to tell if pictures, videos or text were made by AI, but are not confident in their ability to do so

https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2025/09/17/how-americans...

It seems almost universally reviled in creative fields, and the use I mostly see from ordinary people is more along the lines of natural language searches with Gemini.

AI fans are a bubble within the bubble of technology enthusiasts. It's hardly even universally liked among software engineers.

jrflo 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

People hate the concept of AI taking their jobs and the top-down implementation of it at many companies. People love chatbots.

tsukurimashou 4 hours ago | parent [-]

> People love chatbots

really?

ieie3366 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

And how much of this is due to the sloppers/grifters/conmen who hopped on to the AI train (same thing which happened to crypto?)

I feel like that is what the hate needs to be directed towards. Same thing with crypto. There is fundamentally nothing wrong with the technology itself. It’s that we are letting these scammers become the face of it

malfist 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> There is fundamentally nothing wrong with the technology itself

It is when the foundation of the training set for the technology is predicated on stolen or exploited labor.

ieie3366 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I personally know multiple completely clueless people who are ”founders building AI startup” on linkedin despite having zero business skills, zero technical skills, generally low IQ people, just trying to ride the hype wave to scam themselves into fortune. Of course their tactics involve posting total slop on linkedin, scamming freelancers, outsourcing everything to Pakistan, etc

This kind of behaviour would need to be name-and-shamed and preferably some sort of industry blacklist for bad behaviour.

ryandrake 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Grifters and scammers gravitate towards certain technologies (and not others) and become the face of them because of something about those technologies. They are not picking random inventions and then adopting them to their scams.

hatsuseno 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yeah, that figure of a billion comes from OpenAI directly, I wouldn't put too much stock in its validity or relevance.

SketchySeaBeast 4 hours ago | parent [-]

It also doesn't qualify how or how often the users use the app. Online games like to do this too - "40M registered users!" when the number of players with an active subscription are a tiny fraction.

milkshakes 4 hours ago | parent [-]

it's weekly active users https://openai.com/index/scaling-ai-for-everyone/

simonklitj 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Even just in my family, the attitude has shifted significantly over the last year. Most of my family members are now critical of it and its effects.

Add to this that if ~6B people are using the internet (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Internet_usage), and ChatGPT only has almost a billion users (and is the largest player in the space), then I’d argue that LLM-users are in fact the minority.

psvv 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm not so sure the silent majority is positive on AI, I think the opposite is more likely. Let's not forget that national poll where it was less popular than ICE -- I think it was 26% positive vs 46% negative.

My view is AI is becoming a poster-child for the increasing wealth disparity. When people are negative on AI it's not just the technology but the entire idea around it. It's simply cool to hate AI and that's going to be a hard hill to overcome, I think.

4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
prmoustache 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

People are much less binary.

A lot of people can hate the existence and most of the consequences of something yet use it, sparingly or addictively

People can hate impact of the car centric societies and its impact on the climate yet use a car and find it convenient when not overused.

Social medias is another example. A lot of people agree for the most part it didn't make our society better yet they are addicted to doomscroll on instagram or tiktok.

People can use chatgpt to get a picture of them in Myasaki style yet hate that AI can be used to get rid of jobs. Even at developers level, some people might find AI useful in some areas but hate vibecoding and AI slop.

esrauch 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think the vast majority of people just "don't care" for all possible topics.

rglullis 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

One can use it even while hating it.

righthand 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There’s only a billion people on earth? You’re right that is the vast majority of people.

dist-epoch 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

This is the old "why do protesters against capitalism have iPhones" defense.

b65e8bee43c2ed0 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

it is very amusing to read delusional takes like "everyone hates AI" when everyone I know who uses a computer for work is increasingly reliant on chatbots.

I don't know how many times do these people need to be taught that their little bubble of terminally online folx is not "everyone". twice is not enough, apparently.

1shooner 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

"My bubble is more correct then the bubble of those I disagree with". There are objective data to refer to:

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2026/03/12/key-findi...

https://poll.qu.edu/poll-release?releaseid=3955

b65e8bee43c2ed0 4 hours ago | parent [-]

>5. A majority of teens use AI chatbots. Roughly two-thirds of U.S. teens ages 13 to 17 (64%) say they ever use an AI chatbot, according to a fall 2025 survey.

>6. A growing share of U.S. workers say at least some of their work is done with AI. That share has risen from 16% in 2024 to 21% in a September 2025 survey.

>8. Younger adults are more likely than older Americans to be aware of and use AI.

so, uh, thanks for proving my point?

also, I don't live in the US (thank G-d!), and we don't have that particular kulturkampf here. it is as foreign to us as your plastic straw debates.

footy 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> twice is not enough, apparently.

what is this a reference to?

b65e8bee43c2ed0 4 hours ago | parent [-]

a certain politician that "everyone" hates.

energy123 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Opinion polling of the public about AI paints a very unfavorable picture, so it's not delusional. People use it but they fear it's going to take their livelihood. At the very least it has injected a significant amount of uncertainty into people's lives.

infraredshift 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]