| ▲ | piltdownman 2 hours ago | |
In terms of ergonomics, resonance and so on, there's not many terribly optimal solidbody electronic guitar shapes that deviate from the Les Paul/Strat/Tele trinity. Explorers, Flying Vs and the like are basically genre-oddities for aesthetics. Guitars are not about aesthetics, otherwise Fender wouldn't have marques like Squier or ranges like Highway One to differentiate their low-quality tiers. | ||
| ▲ | snide 40 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
> Guitars are not about aesthetics My wife used to work at Acoustic Guitar magazine. She said the most common sales line to sell a guitar at Guitar Center was "it looks good on you". The sound of guitars might not be aesthetics, but in regards to sales, it most certainly is. Everyone plays the same guitars because they grew up seeing their idols play those guitars. | ||
| ▲ | bobchadwick 23 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Guitars are very much about aesthetics, which is why they're so often strategically placed in the background on Zoom calls. | ||
| ▲ | liveoneggs 25 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | |
[dead] | ||