| ▲ | cassianoleal 2 hours ago | |||||||
> According to Fender, the outcome of the case – launched against a Chinese manufacturer – gave the firm the legal right to “protect its designs in global commerce”. So they used China scare as a trojan horse to sue other US manufacturers? There's some delicious irony in that. | ||||||||
| ▲ | criddell 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Plus the Chinese firm didn't even show up to defend themselves, so it was a default judgement. | ||||||||
| ||||||||