Let me let you in on a little industry "secret"

You can't trust those results no matter what

The pages that they pull in to source that data all contain affiliate links and companies contact websites to get their tools to the tops of those lists by paying money often monthly. I know this because I do this...

It's basically standard SEO but it also manipulates AI like ChatGPT very very easily

▲

SlinkyOnStairs an hour ago | parent | next [-]

> It's basically standard SEO but it also manipulates AI like ChatGPT very very easily

There are key differences.

1) Google doesn't get paid for the SEO, so even is crime is involved, Google isn't directly responsible.

2) AI ads are unmarked, which is illegal pretty much everywhere. And because of the way LLMs work, it is impossible to tell where a given output came from, neither which part of the prompt/context nor whether it's from the prompt or training.

	▲	jmathai an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		> 1) Google doesn't get paid for the SEO, so even is crime is involved, Google isn't directly responsible. Google doesn't get paid directly for the SEO but they definitely benefit monetarily. Do a recipe search and ask yourself if these are the results the user would like to see. Google benefits by not penalizing sites which litter themselves with ads. It's not that indirect.
	▲	weird-eye-issue 39 minutes ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I'm just talking about the methods that business owners can use for getting good SEO or AI recommendations are basically the same thing, not sure what point you are trying to make?

▲

faangguyindia 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Simplest way to do is by running affiliate program for your SaaS and shady marketers will do everything to get sales if it's profitable.

	▲	weird-eye-issue 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Eh not really They won't get you on any worthwhile list unless it's their own because it's too risky for them and any site they would publish it on would want to use their own affiliate link. Unless of course we are talking about something like Medium or YouTube which does work And then of course there's the fraudsters who will bid on branded keywords we have banned dozens of people for that

▲

reactordev 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

This is why local AI is so important

▲

bayindirh 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It's already being trained on "public" (ethical or otherwise) data. So, it already has ingested that kind of "optimization" during pre-training and training.

I don't think you can fine-tune your way out of it.

▲

fsflover 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This is far from widespread at the moment, so it'll be possible to at least use the current cutting-edge models locally in the future.

	▲	bayindirh 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Far from widespread? SEO has seeped to all crevices of the internet for the last 20 years.

▲

ToucanLoucan 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

People still think these things are smart. That if their word generator eats enough of the Internet, it will somehow give them the real information that's otherwise hidden. Or perhaps a better word; filter the bullshit.

To filter bullshit it would first have to understand bullshit, and it doesn't. That's why an LLM will tell you the solution to a problem that doesn't work, and argue with you when you correct it.

	▲	bayindirh 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		This is what bothers me a lot. For the people who doesn't know how it's made or want to believe, it's a miracle. For me, it's a resource wasting text generator. I'll not lie, I don't use OpenAI, Mistral or Anthropic's models, even for coding. I prefer to read my API docs and cry once. I used Gemini, five or six times in total. Twice I asked a couple of very specific things, and it unearthed them. Since they were not products, but information, that was helpful. Twice, it has given wrong information. When I "told" it, there was another way, it said "of course there are two ways", etc. Tasteless and time wasting. I don't like using an LLM all day long, or offload my thinking to them. It's the ultimate self-poisoning incident. And as you say, these algorithms can't know right/wrong/logical/bullshit, etc. They just spew out text.

▲

rplnt 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That doesn't solve this particular problem. Your local model was trained on reddit comments written by bots.

▲

Schweigerose 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

How do you make sure that the model you run locally is not tainted? Is there even a way to confirm this without providing the complete training set?

	▲	psb5 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Fwiw I just run kiwix/zeal locally which has old school search index of all articles in wiki/stackoverflow etc. That seems enough for most of my day to day use.

▲

soloto 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Local AI will have the bias that existed at the time of its training, which is different from no bias. For stuff that needs to be current, a local LLM would need to search the net regardless.

	▲	embedding-shape 2 hours ago \| parent [-]
		And since "no bias" isn't something that actually exists in reality when it comes to language or even anything near humans, "bias in local model I can introspect" will always be miles ahead of "bias I know is there, but cannot introspect".

▲

jondea 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It's less compromised, but it's still basing the answer on compromised queries. This is why I pay for independent reviews (e.g Which) where their incentives are more aligned with yours.

▲

2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[deleted]

▲

rdtsc 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Not if the models come from Google. The ads will be implicit in the model. X is better that Y an Z would be easy to add to a the training set.

▲

pautasso 34 minutes ago | parent [-]

Does this mean the model must be retrained every time a new ad is posted? How much are AI ads going to cost?

	▲	rdtsc 20 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		Yeah, I meant not individual ads but implicit forced/influenced preference for certain brands. Let’s say it always picks Coke vs Pepsi when giving an example of a soft drink. Or picks BMW when asked to pick the best car. Which cloud provider is the best? -Why, GCP of course, etc. Companies then get to bid for a preference “place”. This is more like Google paying to be the search engine default in Firefox.

▲

FergusArgyll 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

How does that help if it's using search? You get whatever the search engine outputs

▲

weird-eye-issue 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Local AI models pull in search results just like ChatGPT does ...

And they are trained on web data just like any other model...